How can mid-tier art galleries evolve their business models in response to rising operational costs, collector disengagement, and other market pressures? This article is based on the firsthand experience and reflections of Robbie Fitzpatrick, a Paris-based gallerist who recently closed his fixed gallery location and adopted a nomadic exhibition model.
Context: The Changing Landscape of the Gallery Business Models
For decades, the private gallery business has relied on a well-established model: maintaining a permanent exhibition space, organizing a series of rotating shows, and participating in international art fairs to extend their market reach. This approach was founded on the belief that the physical gallery space served as both a commercial showroom and a cultural venue, shaping contemporary artistic discourse while facilitating sales.
In recent years this traditional gallery model has come under increasing pressure. Exorbitant markups, heavy promotional costs, increasing competition from mega-galleries, and the expansion of auction houses into the primary market are key factors driving galleries toward the need for new business models.
Market Monopolization: A Shrinking Space for Mid-Tier Galleries
One of the most significant changes in the art market over the past two decades has been the rise of mega-galleries, such as Gagosian, Hauser & Wirth, and David Zwirner. These dominant players not only represent the world’s most sought-after artists but also possess the financial resources to expand internationally, establish multiple locations, and engage in high-profile collaborations.
The aggressive recruitment of talent by mega-galleries limits the ability of smaller and mid-tier galleries to grow alongside their artists, creating an increasingly unequal market structure. These blue-chip galleries also offer financial incentives that smaller galleries cannot match.
Collector Burnout and the Changing Dynamics of Engagement
A very alarming trend in the contemporary art market is the declining presence of young, dedicated collectors. This is not just a matter of financial resources; in fact, global wealth has grown significantly in recent years. Rather, it reflects behavioral and cultural change.
Fitzpatrick highlights a crucial shift in wealth mentality, whereas past generations saw art collecting as part of a larger social responsibility, many of today’s ultra-wealthy individuals prioritize financial investment and personal branding over cultural contribution.
Beyond the decline of young collectors, there is a broader crisis of attraction. The initial surge of enthusiasm that followed COVID-19 pandemic, with its overconsumption and overexposure, resulted in disengagement, with collectors becoming more selective. Galleries now compete not only with each other but also with audience fatigue.
The Rise of “Safe” Art and the Decline of Experimentation
As collectors become more cautious and disengaged, they gravitate toward “safe” investments, favoring artists with established market value rather than those taking creative risks. Beyond the economic and artistic implications of this crisis, the psychological toll on gallerists themselves cannot be overlooked. Fitzpatrick describes the high-stakes nature of running a gallery in an uncertain market, highlighting the constant pressure to perform and the financial risk associated with participation in art fairs.
Beyond the White Cube: The Rise of Nomadic and Adaptive Gallery Models
As traditional white-cube galleries face increasing economic uncertainty, some are experimenting with alternative models that prioritize flexibility, sustainability, and collaboration. Hybrid approaches (digital platforms, advisory services) sit alongside nomadic and collaborative exhibition formats that move beyond a permanent space.
Despite the compelling advantages of a nomadic approach, Fitzpatrick initially faced significant skepticism from his peers. Yielding to their concerns, in 2021, he decided to open a new space in Marais, Paris, hoping to create an environment that could function as both a gallery and a creative hub. But while the gallery was initially successful, selling out most of its exhibitions in its first year, he soon felt constrained by the limitations of a fixed location. Financial pressure, repetitive programming, and declining engagement led him to embrace his initial instinct—to pursue a more flexible way of presenting art.
In 2024, Fitzpatrick officially announced that he would be transitioning his gallery into a nomadic program of site-specific exhibitions held in unique locations across the globe.
His reasoning for this shift was rooted in a fundamental question: If I cannot compete with blue-chip galleries on their terms, how can I compete in a different way? Fitzpatrick realized that his strength lay in curation, storytelling, and creating compelling exhibition contexts, qualities that could be amplified rather than limited by a nomadic model.
Beyond Transactions: Reinventing Gallery Revenue Streams and Artist Support Models
For decades, galleries have acted as intermediaries between artists and collectors, with revenue primarily from artwork sales. As the traditional system faces crisis, it has become clear this model alone is no longer sufficient. A fundamental reassessment of the role of galleries is now underway, with some gallerists exploring alternative revenue streams beyond direct sales. This shift is not merely a response to economic necessity but also a reflection of broader cultural and technological changes within the art market.
One significant opportunity is to recast the gallery-artist relationship. As sales become less predictable, galleries can adopt more dynamic roles—agents, mediators, and facilitators beyond the traditional market. The increasing intersection of the art world with the luxury sector offers growth potential. However, luxury is not the only sector where artists can find alternative sources of income. Fitzpatrick believes that collaboration with start-ups and the tech industry could present an even greater opportunity for financial sustainability.
In this expanded role, galleries act not just as sales platforms but as brokers and advisors, leveraging expertise and market knowledge.
New Paths in the Art Market: The Rise of the Nomadic Gallery Model
Nomadic galleries are becoming increasingly prominent, appearing at major art fairs and key moments in the art world. While the white-cube gallery is unlikely to disappear entirely, there is growing recognition that alternative business models are necessary to sustain the industry. The success of the nomadic model will depend on its ability to balance flexibility with stability, ensuring that collectors, artists, and curators feel confident in their investment and engagement. It will also rely not only on innovation, but also on ensuring that evolving practices remain legible and accessible to the audiences they aim to serve.
Fitzpatrick acknowledged that his ability to adopt a nomadic model was shaped by more than vision alone—it was made possible by years of experience, visibility, and client development. “I don’t think I would have been able to attract the same number of visitors if I had begun with this model,” he noted, pointing to the decade he spent building a reputation through fixed gallery spaces and art fair participation.
IMPORTANT: note that this article contains scientific references that we have omitted to lighten the text. Please consult the original article if you wish to quote excerpts.
Contact us at mmiam@hec.ca to request a free copy of the full article published in the International Journal of Arts Management, Volume 28, Number 2, Winter 2026.
You can also browse our abridged research articles here.